Dispute Resolution

[stream provider=video flv=x:/thelibertygang.com/wp-content/uploads/fija-ld/fija-dld.flv img=x:/thelibertygang.com/wp-content/uploads/group-avatars/2/7d85097d7b30877409972dfddd703d02-bpthumb.jpg mp4=x:/thelibertygang.com/wp-content/uploads/fija-ld/fija-dld.mp4 embed=false share=true width=640 height=360 dock=true controlbar=over bandwidth=high autostart=true /]

Dispute Resolution, a work in progress. On this page, we explore our own choices for Alternative Dispute …

We do not agree to be liable for the actions of governments or your actions in seeking to establish your Individual Freedoms.  You are warned that Freedom is not without risk.

These are a few of the Free Market Alternatives we are exploring.  Before we launch, we will make our choice and list what we are exploring.

In the event of any disagreement, we agree to resolve it using any mutually agreed on form of dispute resolution, excluding the courts provided by any state, or by default through binding arbitration through the American Arbitration Association.

Over time and by watching the factors of cost, speed, effectiveness and our own judgment as to the justice of the different alternatives, we may change.  In the event we make changes, all of our members, suppliers, affiliates or others we may have some form of contract with will be notified via email.

It would be wise to check the alternatives periodically as emails do not always get seen for whatever reason.

At that time, you can decide whether or not to continue the relationship.

The David Kekich Alternatives:

1.  Each party in a dispute creates a dispute presentation and a proposed settlement of the dispute.

The jurors selects one or the other proposal in its entirety.*

* This is interesting because (perhaps) both parties have to seek a just settlement.  In a normal court of law, both parties seek a win/lose result within the boundaries of the legal system and whatever it may say that week.

In this situation if one party takes a ridiculous stance where the other is attempting to seek restitution to balance an injury, the ridiculous stance may be tossed… Maybe.

There is the risk that one party will take a ridiculous stance in the hopes the other party takes a reasonable stance because the worst that could happen is a reasonable result while the ridiculous offer could strike and mine a vein of unreasonableness.

Or it could be boundaries for the decision are set on the front end.  For instance, we agree to be liable for the most recent month’s payment to TheLibertyGang.com.

It could be a substantial penalty could be applied in the event of someone seeking injustice through alternative dispute resolution.  Perhaps the complaining party would need to secure a bond in the they were seeking to go outside of the agreed on parameters of the agreement.  If they seek millions because something they did not anticipate went wrong, the bond could be forfeited to offset the costs of dealing with a claim clearly outside of the terms of agreement.

Obviously, this is not a perfect solution; but, could be the foundation of a good one.

It’s advantages are speed, cost and hopefully justice.

2.  Each party in a dispute creates a dispute presentation and a proposed settlement of the dispute.

The jurors selects one or the other proposal in its entirety or if the jurors feel neither would reflect justice, the jurors could create their own solution.

In a free market, more and more alternatives will develop.  They will learn from each other and improve every aspect or go out of business for lack of customers.


We will continue to explore how to improve on the current system offered by the courts where each side hires a gladiator who attempt to slaughter the other side in a win/lose battle.  Generally the better gladiator with the most funding wins.

In a dispute with any government agency, the judge, the prosecutor and public defenders receive their Power, Position, Paychecks and Perks based on the continued Power of the State.

If you have an attorney who works for you, s/he cannot do anything against the instructions of the judge or your attorney risks losing their entry to practice their profession… It is not like the attorney can stand and demand the Jury be left to decide the facts and the law; then, if found in contempt by the state, someone will come along and override the state’s imposition of their Rule.

You are a slave and the best you get is someone who will make a great deal of money even if you are being railroaded by the state.

The courts are incredibly expensive, slow and invasive.  Generally if you end up in a court battle, you will lose even if the other side does not win.

Although an outcome may be decided, rarely will justice prevail.